Note: I’ve decided to split this entry into two. The part on CS226 can be found on the next entry. All comments have been moved accordingly.
Do you have any comments on the latest issue of NTU Tribune? I’m very disappointed with the latest issue, because there are really lots and lots of rooms for improvement. In my opinion, the professionality of Tribune didn’t seem to be that apparent–of course unless it really intended to make itself look not-so-professional, which I doubt it did. I think I should be more straightforward: The layout sucks. Totally. Terribly. Horribly.
I said this in my comments to Spectra, but it is applicable as well here: Although the members of a publication may not be professionals, the least that can be done is making it look a little bit professional. Lack of time is not an excuse.
I mean, put it side-by-side with The Chronicles and you’ll see a stark difference between the two newsletters. Really, Tribune’s looks lately absolutely pale in comparison with Chronicles.
People can argue that “it’s the content that matters”. But, as they say, first impression counts. This is where the good layout shines and the bad one doesn’t. Yeah, it’s true that The Chronicles is done by those who are so-called more-trained in the industry (Communication Studies students), but Tribune is still a publication, and so the same thing applies. Present something nicely and you’ll get more people who are interested to know what you’re trying to say. Present it badly and even though the contents are very interesting, some people will simply brush it off.
Examples of such terrible layout (and presentation) include lots of spelling mistakes here and there, layout problems such as awkward empty spaces in most pages, various capitalisations in a single headline, and even the informal use of multiple punctuation marks (examples include “Free Shuttle Bus and more..”, “Bye-bye Uni Ball ….. HELLO WELCOME PARTY 2005!”, “Symphonic anyone??”, “Incredible Indeah!!!”). Yes, those are actual headlines. And why must it be “Indeah” when the writer could have simple used “India”?!?
And the last page doesn’t look like it was printed properly… Its colours are way off. Off as in monochromatic, and even then it looks very dark; you can’t even see the model behind! The text is totally rubbish–no legible information at all.
Oh, and who the heck links an article from page 13 to page 2?!?
I can’t even imagine how these obviously glaring mistakes went through the editors without any modifications at all!
suhu has a detailed page-to-page comment on the issue. Check out the comment section on this post to take a look. It’s in Indonesian… But I might translate it into English one of these days.
bcc
PS: This entry is not written as an attack to Tribune or any of the editors or writers whatsoever. Rather, it is meant to be a comment by a reader. I’m hoping that, should this entry be discovered or read by anyone related to The Tribune, it can be used to improve future issues of Tribune.